The Role of Institutional Transparency in Reducing Corruption Perceptions: A Cross-National Study of Developing Democracies
Keywords:
institutional transparency, corruption perceptions, developing democracies, accountability, open government, cross-national analysisAbstract
This paper examines the relationship between institutional transparency and perceptions of corruption in developing democracies. It argues that transparency is not merely a technical attribute of government disclosure but a political condition that shapes the credibility of anti-corruption efforts, the visibility of administrative behavior, and the ability of citizens and intermediaries to impose accountability. Drawing on cross-national research on corruption, transparency, e-government, open government data, and accountability, the article synthesizes the main mechanisms through which transparency can reduce corruption perceptions, while also identifying the institutional conditions under which the effect is muted. The review indicates that transparency tends to be more effective when it is paired with publicity, media freedom, electoral competition, and enforceable accountability channels. By contrast, formal transparency rules with weak enforcement, low civic oversight, or selective disclosure often produce only limited perceptual change. The manuscript therefore contributes a structured analytical framework for studying developing democracies, where institutional openness, digitalization, and corruption control remain uneven. The article concludes that transparency can lower corruption perceptions, but only when it is embedded in a broader ecosystem of institutional oversight.
Downloads
References
Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003
Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12033
Crepaz, M., & Arikan, G. (2024). The effects of transparency regulation on political trust and perceived corruption: Evidence from a survey experiment. Regulation & Governance, 18(3), 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12555
Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: An empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005
Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955
Garcia-Murillo, M. (2013). Does a government web presence reduce perceptions of corruption? Information Technology for Development, 19(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2012.751574
Jiménez, J. L., & Albalate, D. (2018). Transparency and local government corruption: What does lack of transparency hide? European Journal of Government and Economics, 7(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2018.7.2.4509
Khan, A., Krishnan, S., & Dhir, A. (2021). Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120737
Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries? World Development, 37(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.07.002
Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110377602
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316286937
Relly, J. E., & Sabharwal, M. (2009). Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.04.002
Sung, H.-E. (2004). Democracy and political corruption: A cross-national comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000016225.75792.02
Transparency International. (2025). The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption Perceptions Index scores are calculated. https://www.transparency.org/en/news/how-cpi-scores-are-calculated
Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
Warren, M. E. (2004). What does corruption mean in a democracy? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00073.x
World Bank. (2024). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and 2024 update. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
World Bank. (2025). Worldwide Governance Indicators: Documentation and data. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators/documentation
Žuffová, M. (2020). Do FOI laws and open government data deliver as anti-corruption policies? Evidence from a cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101480
